|
Novus Biologicals
plin5 recombinant peptide ![]() Plin5 Recombinant Peptide, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/plin5 recombinant peptide/product/Novus Biologicals Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plin5 recombinant peptide - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Akoya Biosciences
antibody against cd3 ![]() Antibody Against Cd3, supplied by Akoya Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody against cd3/product/Akoya Biosciences Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody against cd3 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
novus biologicals
nbp1-77152pep ![]() Nbp1 77152pep, supplied by novus biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/nbp1-77152pep/product/novus biologicals Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nbp1-77152pep - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Proteintech
antibodies against chac1 ![]() Antibodies Against Chac1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against chac1/product/Proteintech Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against chac1 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Vector Laboratories
bloxall ![]() Bloxall, supplied by Vector Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/bloxall/product/Vector Laboratories Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bloxall - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Sino Biological
anti pd 1 ab ![]() Anti Pd 1 Ab, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti pd 1 ab/product/Sino Biological Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti pd 1 ab - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bio X Cell
be0236 invivomab polyclonal syrian hamster igg bioxcell ![]() Be0236 Invivomab Polyclonal Syrian Hamster Igg Bioxcell, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/be0236 invivomab polyclonal syrian hamster igg bioxcell/product/Bio X Cell Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
be0236 invivomab polyclonal syrian hamster igg bioxcell - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Sino Biological
pd l1 targeting ability ![]() Pd L1 Targeting Ability, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/pd l1 targeting ability/product/Sino Biological Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pd l1 targeting ability - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Proteintech
inf2 ![]() Inf2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/inf2/product/Proteintech Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
inf2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd
flow cytometry antibodies ![]() Flow Cytometry Antibodies, supplied by Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/flow cytometry antibodies/product/Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
flow cytometry antibodies - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Alomone Labs
trpv1 receptor ![]() Trpv1 Receptor, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/trpv1 receptor/product/Alomone Labs Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trpv1 receptor - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
nbp1 48336pep ![]() Nbp1 48336pep, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/nbp1 48336pep/product/Novus Biologicals Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nbp1 48336pep - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: The Journal of Physiology
Article Title: Sprint interval and traditional endurance training increase net intramuscular triglyceride breakdown and expression of perilipin 2 and 5
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.240952
Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative immunofluorescence images of PLIN5 (A), IMTG (B), and the merged images (C) with the yellow areas describing regions of overlap between PLIN5 and IMTG images. The yellow objects were then extracted (to measure the number of PLIN5-LDs; D), and the number subtracted from the total number of LDs to quantify the number of PLIN5-null-LD. The same procedure was used to obtain values of colocalization between PLIN2 and IMTG. White bar, 5 μm. The number of PLIN2-LD (filled bars) and PLIN2-null-LD (open bars) were quantified before (PreEx) and after exercise (PostEx), prior to (E) and following (F) training in both the SIT and ET groups. The same analysis was repeated for PLIN5 for pre- (G) and post-training (H). *Main effect of exercise bout (P < 0.05 vs. pre-exercise).
Article Snippet: The specificity of the PLIN5 antibody was confirmed in a competition experiment in which a
Techniques: Immunofluorescence
Journal: The Journal of Physiology
Article Title: Sprint interval and traditional endurance training increase net intramuscular triglyceride breakdown and expression of perilipin 2 and 5
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.240952
Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative immunofluorescence images of PLIN5 (stained green) in combination with WGA to identify the cell border (stained blue) in skeletal muscle, pre- (A) and post- (B) 6 weeks of SIT. Type I fibres are indicated with a ‘I’, all other fibres are assumed type II fibres. White bar, 50 μm. PLIN5 expression, quantified from immunofluorescence images of PLIN5, in type I and type II fibres obtained before (C) and after (D) 6 weeks of SIT (filled bars) or ET (open bars). PLIN5 expression quantified from immunofluorescence images correlated with PLIN5 expression determined following immunoblotting of whole muscle homogenates (E). Values are presented as means ± SEM (n= 8 per group). *Main effect of fibre type (P < 0.05 vs. type I fibres). †Main effect of training intervention (P < 0.05 vs. pre-training).
Article Snippet: The specificity of the PLIN5 antibody was confirmed in a competition experiment in which a
Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Expressing, Western Blot
Journal: The Journal of Physiology
Article Title: Sprint interval and traditional endurance training increase net intramuscular triglyceride breakdown and expression of perilipin 2 and 5
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.240952
Figure Lengend Snippet: Bivariate correlation analysis
Article Snippet: The specificity of the PLIN5 antibody was confirmed in a competition experiment in which a
Techniques:
Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Article Title: GSK3β Inhibition Is the Molecular Pivot That Underlies the Mir-210-Induced Attenuation of Intrinsic Apoptosis Cascade during Hypoxia
doi: 10.3390/ijms23169375
Figure Lengend Snippet: List of antibodies and antibody-blocking peptides used in the study.
Article Snippet: BAK antibody blocking peptide , ELISA detection , N/A , N/A , Novus Biologicals ,
Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Blocking Assay, Peptide ELISA, Activity Assay
Journal: Redox biology
Article Title: Protein S-glutathionylation confers cellular resistance to ferroptosis induced by glutathione depletion.
doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2025.103660
Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3. Decreased glutathione pools by CHAC1 reduces protein-SSG and aggravates APAP-induced hepatotoxicity and ferroptosis in APAP-injured mice liver. (A) Quantification of GSH in the liver tissues of Chac1+/+ Ad-GFP, Chac1−/−Ad-GFP, and Chac1−/−Ad-CHAC1 mice treated with saline or 300 mg/kg APAP for 2 and 6 h (Data are mean ± SEM of n = 3 and 5 mice/group, t-test). (B) Quantification of GSSG in the liver tissues of Chac1+/+ Ad-GFP, Chac1−/−Ad-GFP, and Chac1−/−Ad- CHAC1 mice treated with saline or 300 mg/kg APAP for 2 and 6 h (Data are mean ± SEM of n = 3 and 5 mice/group, t-test). (C) Western blot analysis of S-glu tathionylated proteins in the liver tissues of Chac1+/+ Ad-GFP and Chac1−/−Ad-GFP mice treated with 300 mg/kg APAP for 2 and 6 h. GAPDH was used as an internal reference, followed by quantification of relative levels of S-glutathionylated proteins after 6 h of APAP treatment (Data are mean ± SEM of n = 3 mice/ group, t-test). (D) Western blot analysis of S-glutathionylated proteins and CHAC1-FLAG protein in the liver tissues of Chac1−/−Ad-GFP and Chac1−/−Ad-CHAC1 mice treated with 300 mg/kg APAP for 6 h. GAPDH was used as an internal reference. Statistical chart shows the relative expression levels of S-glutathionylated proteins 6 h after APAP treatment (Data are mean ± SEM of n = 4 mice/group, t-test). (E) Serum levels of ALT and AST in Chac1+/+ Ad-GFP, Chac1−/−Ad-GFP, and Chac1−/−Ad-CHAC1 mice treated with 300 mg/kg APAP for 6 h (Data are mean ± SEM of n = 5 mice/group, t-test). (F) H&E staining, 4-HNE protein adduct staining in liver tissues of Chac1+/+ Ad-GFP, Chac1−/−Ad-GFP and Chac1−/−Ad-CHAC1 mice treated with 300 mg/kg APAP for 6 h. Scale bars = 200 μm. The area of liver injury and immunohistochemical score for 4-HNE protein adduct staining were quantified (Data are mean ± SEM of n = 5 mice/group, t-test). APAP, acetaminophen; GSH, glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; H&E, haematoxylin and eosin; Chac1−/−, Chac1- deficient; Chac1+/+, wild-type controls.
Article Snippet: For Western blot, lysates were probed with specific
Techniques: Saline, Western Blot, Expressing, Staining, Immunohistochemical staining
Journal: Redox biology
Article Title: Protein S-glutathionylation confers cellular resistance to ferroptosis induced by glutathione depletion.
doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2025.103660
Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 4. Redox proteomic analysis reveals that the S-glutathionylation of Cys90 on ARF6 is regulated by CHAC1 in ferroptotic PMHs induced by APAP. (A) Flowchart outlining the key experimental procedures for proteomic analysis of S-glutathionylation. (B) Scatter plot illustrating the distribution of differential modification sites, sorted by the ratio of Ad-GFP + APAP/Ad-GFP. Red dots indicating up-regulation of significant differences, blue dots indicating down-regulation of significant differences, and grey dots indicating no significant differences (CV < 0.1, fold change ≥1.2). (C) Scatter plot showing the distribution of differential modification sites, sorted by the ratio of Ad-CHAC1 + APAP/Ad-GFP + APAP. Red dots indicating up-regulation of significant differences, blue dots indicating down-regulation of significant differences and grey dots indicating no significant differences (CV < 0.1, fold change ≥1.2). (D) Venn diagram showing differentially modified sites under both APAP stimulation and CHAC1 overexpression (Fold change ≥1.2). (E) The heat map illustrating the union of differential modification sites in Ad-GFP, Ad-GFP + APAP, Ad-CHAC1, and Ad-CHAC1 + APAP comparison groups (CV < 0.1, fold change ≥1.2). (F) Scatter plot showing differentially modified sites under both APAP stimulation and CHAC1 overexpression; the order was sorted by the ratio of Ad-GFP + APAP/Ad-GFP (CV < 0.1, fold change ≥1.2). (G) Two-stage mass spectrometry of the glutathionylated peptide from ARF6 in PMHs. The secondary mass spectrum shows fragment ion information of the ARF6 C90 peptide segment. (H) Histogram showing the relative modification abundance of ARF6 C90 in different treatment groups, with glutathionylated peptides identified and quantified by LC-MS/MS (All values were normalized by the mean of the AdGFP-CON group, data are mean ± SEM of n = 2 biologically independent samples). (I) IP assay showing the expression of S-glutathionylated ARF6 in 293T cells overexpressing Myc-tagged ARF6. Whole cell lysates were used to confirm the expression of ARF6. (J) Two-stage mass spectrometry of the glutathionylated peptide from ARF6 in 293T cells overexpressing Myc-tagged ARF6. The secondary mass spectrum shows fragment ion infor mation of the ARF6 C90 peptide segment. PMH, primary mouse hepatocyte; IP, immunoprecipitation.
Article Snippet: For Western blot, lysates were probed with specific
Techniques: Modification, Over Expression, Comparison, Mass Spectrometry, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy, Expressing, Immunoprecipitation
Journal: Cancer cell
Article Title: Non-conventional inhibitory CD4 + Foxp3 − PD-1 hi T cells as a biomarker of immune checkpoint blockade activity
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.009
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A,B) Mice were injected with 0.25×105 (n=5, tumor onset in 4 of 5 injected mice), 0.5×105 (n=5), 1×105 (n=5, one mouse died before FACS analysis), 2×105 B16 cells (n=5, one mouse died before FACS analysis), and 2 weeks later 4PD1hi and Tregs (percentage of total CD4+) were analyzed in spleen (SP), tumor-draining lymph nodes (DLNs) and tumor (TM) in comparison with spleens from naive mice (SP naive) (mean ± SEM; unpaired t test) (A). Pearson correlation analyses of tumor burden and intra-tumor 4PD1hi %, Tregs % and the indicated intra-tumor T-cell ratios (B). (C) Percentage of 4PD1hi among CD4+ T cells in healthy donors’ PB (n=7), advanced melanoma patients’ PB (n=47) and tumors (TM, n=10); NSCLC patients’ PB (n=51) and tumors (TM, n=10) (mean ± SEM; unpaired t test), and representative plots of Foxp3 and PD-1 expression in CD4+CD45+ T cells, and CD25 expression in 4PD1hi, Tregs and 4PD1− from the indicated samples. * = p<0.05, ** = p<0.01, *** = p<0.001, **** = p<0.0001. See also Figure S1.
Article Snippet: Sections were blocked for 30 min with Background Buster solution (Innovex) followed by avidin/biotin blocking for 8 min. Stainings were performed sequentially starting with an anti-CD4 Ab (polyclonal, R&D Systems, 2 μg/ml) followed by an anti-Foxp3 Ab (clone FJK-16s, eBioscience, 0.5 μg/ml), and finally an
Techniques: Injection, Expressing
Journal: Cancer cell
Article Title: Non-conventional inhibitory CD4 + Foxp3 − PD-1 hi T cells as a biomarker of immune checkpoint blockade activity
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.009
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schema of in vitro suppression assay of CD45.1+ T cells (target) with 4PD1hi, 4PD1− or PD-1−Tregs FACS-sorted from spleens of naive Foxp3-GFP mice (CD45.1−, effectors). (B) CTV dilution and frequency of CD44+CD25+ in total CD45.1+CD4+ target T cells in the indicated co-cultures at the indicated effector:target ratios after 48-hr incubation (mean ± SD; n=2; 2-way ANOVA, 4PD1hi and Tregs vs 4PD1−). (C) Quantification of IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 by FACS-based bead immunoassay in culture supernatants of CD4+ cells alone or co-cultured with the indicated cells for 48 hr (ratio 1:1; mean ± SD; n=2; unpaired t test). (D) Foxp3, CD25 and PD-1 MFI in effector CD45.1−CD4+ T-cell subsets co-cultured with CD45.1+CD4+ target T cells (ratio 1:1) for 48 hr (mean ± SD; n=2; unpaired t test). (E) In vivo suppression assay with 4PD1hi or Tregs FACS-sorted from B16-bearing Foxp3-GFP mice and co-transferred with CFSE-labeled Pmel/gp100-TCR-specific CD8+ T cells (Pmels) (1:1 ratio) into irradiated CD45.1+ recipients and stimulated in vivo with irradiated B16 cells (schema). Proliferation (CFSE dilution) and activation (CD44 and CD25 expression) of CD45.1−Thy1.1+CD8+ Pmels in recipient spleens (mean ± SEM; n=4–5; unpaired t test). * = p<0.05, ** = p<0.01, *** = p<0.001, **** = p<0.0001. See also Figure S2.
Article Snippet: Sections were blocked for 30 min with Background Buster solution (Innovex) followed by avidin/biotin blocking for 8 min. Stainings were performed sequentially starting with an anti-CD4 Ab (polyclonal, R&D Systems, 2 μg/ml) followed by an anti-Foxp3 Ab (clone FJK-16s, eBioscience, 0.5 μg/ml), and finally an
Techniques: In Vitro, Suppression Assay, Incubation, Cell Culture, In Vivo, Labeling, Irradiation, Activation Assay, Expressing
Journal: Cancer cell
Article Title: Non-conventional inhibitory CD4 + Foxp3 − PD-1 hi T cells as a biomarker of immune checkpoint blockade activity
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.009
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) FACS gating strategy to sort human 4PD1hi, 4PD1− and Tregs based on PD-1 and CD25 expression in CD4+ T cells and related Foxp3 expression (left). Proliferation (CTVlow) and activation (CD25 MFI) of autologous target CD4+ T cells co-cultured with donor-derived 4PD1hi, 4PD1− and Tregs at 1:1 ratio for 72 hr (middle) (mean ± SD; n=3; unpaired t test, 4PD1hi and Tregs vs 4PD1−). Heatmap with unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the indicated cytokines in co-culture supernatants as assessed by Luminex-based bead immunoassay (right). (B,C) Proliferation (CTVlow) of target autologous (auto) CD4+ TILs (B) or donor-derived allogeneic circulating CD8+ T cells (C) co-cultured with human tumor-infiltrating 4PD1hi, 4PD1− or Tregs (1:1 ratio) for 72 (B) or 96 hr (C), and cytokine production by Luminex-based bead immunoassay in the same cultures. Mean ± SD (B melanoma, n=2 with Tregs and 4PD1hi, n=6 with 4PD1−; B NSCLC, n=2 with 4PD1hi, n=3 with 4PD1− and Tregs; C, n=3); unpaired t test, 4PD1hi and Tregs vs 4PD1−. * = p<0.05, ** = p<0.01, *** = p<0.001, **** = p<0.0001. See also Figure S3.
Article Snippet: Sections were blocked for 30 min with Background Buster solution (Innovex) followed by avidin/biotin blocking for 8 min. Stainings were performed sequentially starting with an anti-CD4 Ab (polyclonal, R&D Systems, 2 μg/ml) followed by an anti-Foxp3 Ab (clone FJK-16s, eBioscience, 0.5 μg/ml), and finally an
Techniques: Expressing, Activation Assay, Cell Culture, Derivative Assay, Co-Culture Assay, Luminex
Journal: Cancer cell
Article Title: Non-conventional inhibitory CD4 + Foxp3 − PD-1 hi T cells as a biomarker of immune checkpoint blockade activity
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.009
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Fold changes in circulating 4PD1hi (percentage of total CD4+) in advanced NSCLC patients during treatment with nivo3 (nivolumab 3 mg/kg, once every 2 weeks (q2wks), n=10), nivo3+ipi1 (nivolumab 3 mg/kg + ipilimumab 1 mg/kg, q3wks, q6wks+q2wks, or q12wks+q2wks, n=21), nivo1+ipi1 (nivolumab 1 mg/kg + ipilimumab 1mg/kg, q3wks, or q6wks, n=11) or nivo1+ipi3 (nivolumab 1mg/kg + ipilimumab 3mg/kg, q3wks, n=8) (average ± SEM; 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, nivo3 vs nivo1+ipi1 and nivo3 vs nivo1+ipi3). Representative FACS plots of Foxp3 and PD-1 expression in CD4+ T cells from NSCLC patients treated with nivo1+ipi3 (red) or nivo3 (blue) at the indicated time points. (B) Circulating 4PD1hi (percentage of CD4+) in B16-bearing mice treated with αCTLA-4 monotherapy (100 μg or 300 μg/cycle; average ± SEM, n=7–10) relative to naive mice (n=5) (2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, treated vs naive mice). (C) Pairwise comparison of 4PD1hi (percentage of CD4+) at the indicated time points relative to baseline in advanced melanoma patients during ipilimumab (ipi, 3 mg/kg, q3wks; n=47) or pembrolizumab treatment (pembro, 2 or 10 mg/kg, q3wks; n=52) (average ± SEM) (left). Representative FACS plots of Foxp3 and PD-1 expression in CD4+ T cells from melanoma patients treated with ipi (red) or pembro (blue) at the indicated time points (middle). Pairwise comparison of circulating 4PD1hi/CD4+ % at baseline and 3 weeks after pembro (right). (D) Average ± SEM tumor diameter (left; n=10; 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction) and Kaplan-Meier tumor-free survival curves (right; pooled data from 3 independent experiments, n=30; log-rank test; number of tumor-free mice approximately 100 days after tumor implantation is reported for each group) of B16-bearing mice treated with VRP-TRP2 and αCTLA-4 and/or αPD-1 as indicated. (E) Intra-tumor 4PD1hi and Tregs frequencies one day after treatment completion in B16-bearing mice treated as in D (average ± SEM; n=9–10; unpaired t test). * = p<0.05, ** = p<0.01, *** = p<0.001, **** = p<0.0001. See also Figure S4.
Article Snippet: Sections were blocked for 30 min with Background Buster solution (Innovex) followed by avidin/biotin blocking for 8 min. Stainings were performed sequentially starting with an anti-CD4 Ab (polyclonal, R&D Systems, 2 μg/ml) followed by an anti-Foxp3 Ab (clone FJK-16s, eBioscience, 0.5 μg/ml), and finally an
Techniques: Expressing, Tumor Implantation
Journal: Cancer cell
Article Title: Non-conventional inhibitory CD4 + Foxp3 − PD-1 hi T cells as a biomarker of immune checkpoint blockade activity
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.009
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) In vitro suppression assays with 4PD1hi, Tregs and 4PD1− from spleens of sRBC-immunized or control B16-bearing Foxp3-GFP mice at the indicated ratios. Mean ± SD proliferation (CTVlow) and activation (CD25+CD44+) of target CD4+ T cells, and Foxp3 and PD-1 MFI in CD45.1− 4PD1hi, 4PD1− or Tregs from the same co-cultures after 48-hr incubation (n=2–3; 2-way ANOVA, NT-4PD1hi vs sRBC-4PD1hi). (B) In vitro suppression assays with CXCR5+ and CXCR5− 4PD1hi, 4PD1− and Tregs from spleens (SP) and tumors (TM) of naive and B16-bearing (TB) Foxp3-GFP mice immunized with sRBC. Mean ± SD proliferation (CTVlow) of target CD45.1+CD4+ T cells and quantification of IL-2 by Luminex-based bead immunoassay in culture supernatants after 72-hr incubation with effector cells (1:1 ratio; 4×104 cells from SP; 1×104 cells from TM; n=2–4; unpaired t test). (C) In vitro suppression assays with 4PD1hi, CD44hiPD-1−Foxp3−CD4+ Tmem and Foxp3+ Tregs from spleens of sRBC-immunized Foxp3-GFP mice at the indicated effector:target ratios. Mean ± SD proliferation (CTVlow) and activation (CD25+CD44+) of target CD8+ and CD4+ T cells from 48- and 72-hr co-cultures respectively (n=2–3; 2-way ANOVA, 4PD1hi and Tregs vs Tmem). (D) Average ± SEM tumor diameter of B16-bearing Sh2d1a (SAP) KO and WT C57BL/6J mice treated with αCTLA-4 or control isotype IgG (100 μg x4) starting on day 7 after tumor implantation (suboptimal treatment) (n=4–5; 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction). * = p<0.05, ** = p<0.01, *** = p<0.001, **** = p<0.0001. See also Figure S7.
Article Snippet: Sections were blocked for 30 min with Background Buster solution (Innovex) followed by avidin/biotin blocking for 8 min. Stainings were performed sequentially starting with an anti-CD4 Ab (polyclonal, R&D Systems, 2 μg/ml) followed by an anti-Foxp3 Ab (clone FJK-16s, eBioscience, 0.5 μg/ml), and finally an
Techniques: In Vitro, Activation Assay, Incubation, Luminex, Tumor Implantation
Journal: Cancer cell
Article Title: Non-conventional inhibitory CD4 + Foxp3 − PD-1 hi T cells as a biomarker of immune checkpoint blockade activity
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.009
Figure Lengend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE
Article Snippet: Sections were blocked for 30 min with Background Buster solution (Innovex) followed by avidin/biotin blocking for 8 min. Stainings were performed sequentially starting with an anti-CD4 Ab (polyclonal, R&D Systems, 2 μg/ml) followed by an anti-Foxp3 Ab (clone FJK-16s, eBioscience, 0.5 μg/ml), and finally an
Techniques: Purification, Blocking Assay, Recombinant, Staining, Expressing, Knock-Out, Transgenic Assay, Software